Identifying gases from emission lines

FREE PHYSICS REVISION · UNIT 3 · A1.3.3

Pearson BTEC Level 3 AAQ Applied Science · Issue 7 (May 2026)

What you will learn

Use spectral line patterns to identify elements and mixtures in gases.

Specification mapping: A1.3.3

Prerequisites: A1.3.1, A1.3.2

Physical principles

An element has a characteristic set of allowed atomic energy differences and hence a characteristic pattern of emission lines. Compare measured wavelengths or calibrated line positions with reference spectra. Several matching lines provide stronger evidence than a single colour, because distinct elements can have nearby lines.

In a gas mixture, lines from more than one element may appear. Identify each candidate by a consistent group of positions. Line intensity depends on abundance, excitation conditions, instrument response and transition probabilities; it is not a simple direct measure of concentration without calibration. An absent weak line may be below the instrument’s detection threshold.

A sensible method calibrates wavelength against a known source, checks resolution, records uncertainties and compares line separations. If two reference wavelengths differ by less than the resolution, the instrument may show one unresolved feature. A spectrum can support identification without proving that no other element is present.

Scientific diagram and interpretation

Five lines at 420, 450, 500, 600 and 660 nm represent the fictional X/Y mixture. The horizontal axis begins at 400 nm, not zero. Intensities are illustrative and uncalibrated.
Five lines at 420, 450, 500, 600 and 660 nm represent the fictional X/Y mixture. The horizontal axis begins at 400 nm, not zero. Intensities are illustrative and uncalibrated.

Worked examples and applications

Match a pattern

Illustrative references: gas X has lines at 420, 500 and 660 nm; gas Y at 450 and 600 nm. An unknown has 420, 450, 500, 600 and 660 nm. Both X and Y are supported by the complete set of matches.

Check resolution

An instrument resolves lines separated by at least 2.0 nm. Lines at 589.0 and 589.6 nm differ by 0.6 nm, so they are not resolved by this instrument. A single observed peak does not prove a single transition.

Common misconceptions

One shared line or the overall glow colour does not uniquely identify every component of a mixture.

Examination technique

Quote the actual matching wavelengths and discuss uncertainty or unmatched lines.

For an explanation, connect the physical cause to its effect. For a calculation, state the model, rearrange before substitution, retain intermediate digits, and finish with units. For a data question, refer to the actual readings and distinguish a trend from proof of a cause.

Check your understanding

Five questions. Choose an option, then Check Answer. Read the feedback and use Try Again to reset. Use Tab between controls, arrow keys within radio groups, and Enter or Space on buttons. These local practice answers are not saved.

Question 1 of 5 · A1.3.3

What is strongest identification evidence?

Question 2 of 5 · A1.3.3

An unknown includes all X and Y reference lines. What is supported?

Question 3 of 5 · A1.3.3

Why might a reference line be absent?

Question 4 of 5 · A1.3.3

Lines 0.5 nm apart meet a 2 nm resolution limit how?

Question 5 of 5 · A1.3.3

What is needed for concentration estimates from intensity?